Method and apparatus for removing unwanted dissolved chemicals from liquids

ABSTRACT

The invention discloses and claims various methods for the treatment of various wastewater streams of varying chemical composition using sonication in combination with a variety of other methods, including nucleation, ozonation, flocculation, clarification, adsorption, polishing, and filtration. The methods disclosed and claimed are useful in the treatment of industrial wastewater, brackish water, seawater, and for the treatment of oil and gas-well water as well as wastewater from hydraulic gas-fracturing processes for the production of oil and natural gas.

PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/082323, filed Nov. 20, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated herewith.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a device and a method for removing unwanted microorganisms and dissolved compounds from liquids utilizing a combination of ultra-sonication and other process steps, in particular sonication in combination with addition of oxidizer(s), adsorbents, and nucleation particles.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many methods for removal of microorganisms and compounds from liquids, and in particular wastewater, are known and practiced. For the purposes herein, the term “wastewater” is meant to encompass all effluent from any industrial, domestic, or other process where the effluent contains a substantial amount of water plus microorganisms and/or dissolved chemicals, organic solids, or inorganic solids. Known methods for removing these constituents (hereinafter “treatment”) from wastewater are too diverse and numerous to be adequately summarized herein. However, all such methods have limitations related to the specific physical and chemical activity utilized and the liquid stream being treated. Most commercially available methods either require a large and complex apparatus, or are very expensive to purchase and/or to operate, require large amounts of energy, or create large amounts of waste byproducts that are either difficult to handle and/or are very expensive to dispose of.

Certain liquid streams from a range of industrial, agricultural and food processing, and domestic sources are particularly difficult to treat to achieve applicable chemical- and/or biological specific water quality objectives required for discharge, reuse, or further processing. Example chemicals in “industrial” liquid streams includes: various petroleum hydrocarbons that frequently contaminate ambient water (surface and/or groundwater) during oil and gas exploration, production, refining and/or distribution; various petroleum hydrocarbons, inorganic geochemicals and additives in flow back and produced water (frac water) from oil and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations; various inorganic chemicals in wastewater from mining operations; a range of organic and/or inorganic chemicals in wastewaters from various other manufacturing processes. Example chemicals in “agricultural and food processing” liquid streams includes: chemicals inadvertently added to ambient water (surface and groundwater) notably nitrogenous compounds (e.g., nitrate, nitrite and ammonia) and pesticides from long-term land application; chemicals and/or microorganisms (e.g., coliforms) in animal waste runoff from confined animal facilities (CAFs); hydrocarbons of biological origin in wastewaters from food processing and meat packing facilities. Example chemicals associated with “domestic” liquid streams includes: a wide range of chemicals associated with pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in greywater from publically owned treatment works (POTW) facilities; microorganisms, human waste products, and PPCPs and other chemicals in blackwater (septage) from private septic systems. Such liquid streams are particularly amendable to treatment using aspects of the present invention.

The term “industrial wastewater” as used herein shall include wastewaters and polluted ambient water (surface and groundwater) associated with: petroleum exploration, production, refining and distribution; chemical manufacturing and processing plants; semiconductor and electronics manufacturing; mining operations; other waste streams substantially equivalent to these specifically listed waste streams. The term “agricultural and food processing wastewater” as used herein shall include wastewaters and polluted ambient water (surface and groundwater) associated with confined animal facilities (CAFs) such as dairy, swine, beef, poultry, and aquaculture operations; food processing and production operations, and slaughterhouse and meat packing operations; other waste streams substantially equivalent to these specifically listed waste streams. The term “domestic wastewater” as used herein shall include both greywater (wastewater not containing human waste) and blackwater (wastewater containing human waste); other waste streams substantially equivalent to these specifically listed waste streams.

Removal of salts from brackish water and seawater is currently accomplished through either distillation or reverse osmosis. While these methods are effective, energy requirements and therefore costs are high, preventing widespread use. Methods have been developed to reduce energy costs through use of waste-heat to heat water in distillation or to pretreat water to remove scaling compounds in advance of reverse osmosis treatment. However, alternative methods for removing salts at low energy cost have not been proven effective to date.

There is a need for liquid treatment processes that are capable of removing these difficult dissolved chemicals in a cost-effective manner and that have a broad range of application and use conditions. In addition, the size and complexity of the associated equipment is an important factor in the utility and application of such methods.

The use of oxidizers to sanitize and/or reduce the oxygen demand of domestic, animal, and industrial waste streams is commonplace, with the addition of chlorine the most common method. Biological methods are routinely used to reduce Biological Oxygen Demand (“BOD”) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (“COD”) from these waste streams. Such systems require induction and maintenance of bacterial growth and separation of large amounts of solid waste.

Sonication of liquids is used most commonly in jewelry and parts cleaning It is also used to induce or accelerate chemical processes in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Sonication methods have not heretofore been applied commercially to wastewater treatment as herein presented and claimed.

The addition of nucleating agents to liquids is commonly used in industrial processes to promote precipitation and crystallization. However, nucleating agents are not commonly used in wastewater treatment, due in part to the relatively low concentration of the target compounds in solution and the low efficiency of the precipitation reaction. Methods for improving nucleation efficiency are needed.

Adsorption processes are commonly used in a wide range of industrial processes and waste treatment applications, including removal and/or concentrating of dissolved compounds. Numerous dissolved compounds are resistant to adsorption, due to the specific ion characteristics and the lack of affinities of known adsorbents. Examples of such compounds are most salts, nitrates, nitrites, ammonia, some metals, inorganic oxides, and some hydrocarbons. Methods for improving adsorption characteristics for refractory compounds are therefore needed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention includes various methods for the treatment of liquids to remove various dissolved compounds, solids, and microorganisms using sonication in combination with a variety of other methods. Some of the other methods claimed for use with sonication include nucleation, ozonation, flocculation, clarification, adsorption, polishing, and filtration. The methods disclosed and claimed are useful in the treatment of domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, brackish water, seawater, and for the treatment of oil and gas-well water as well as wastewater from hydraulic gas-fracturing processes for the production of oil and natural gas.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred and alternative examples of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:

FIG. 1 shows a process flow diagram, including steps that are included in one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 shows an example system diagram, identifying various process steps and equipment useable in accordance with principles of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a relationship diagram showing factors used to control the application of ultrasonic energy to the wastewater stream being processed in accordance with principles of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of one embodiment for a sonication device (sonotrode) and sonication chamber that may be used in accordance with principles of the present invention;

FIG. 5A shows a schematic representation for an embodiment for a sonication device (sonotrode) and sonication chamber that may be used in accordance with principles of the present invention, where the sonication device comprises an assembly incorporating multiple sonotrodes in series configuration;

FIG. 5B shows a schematic representation for an embodiment for a sonication device (sonotrode) and sonication chamber that may be used in accordance with principles of the present invention, where the sonication device comprises an assembly incorporating multiple sonotrodes in parallel configuration; and

FIG. 6 shows a schematic representation of an ozone dissolution chamber used in accordance with principles of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

FIG. 1 presents an overview of process steps for a preferred embodiment of the invention useable for the treatment of certain liquids, including domestic sewage and oil- or gas-fracturing wastewater (hereinafter “frac water”). Liquid enters the treatment system 1 under pressure and is temporarily stored in a balancing tank (not shown). A nucleating agent 2 may be added either to the balancing tank or to the flowing liquid as appropriate; such nucleating agent is preferably flyash, pozzolanic mineral particles, polymer micro-spheres, silica or alumina particles, or calcium particles. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that nucleating agents not specifically mentioned herein are also suitable. The liquid may then be pumped through an ozone dissolution chamber 3 where ozone gas bubbles are dissolved to the extent possible and then residual bubbles removed via flotation.

Maximizing ozone concentration in liquids in accordance with principles of the present invention provides for efficient oxidation while minimizing suspended bubbles, and helps maximize ultrasonic energy transfer to the liquid being treated. Moreover, the presence of gas bubbles in the liquid during sonication preferably increases the compressibility of the liquid, dampening the pressure fluctuations created by the vibrations of the sonotrode. Gas bubbles are less likely to be created under these conditions and the collapse of gas bubbles (i.e., cavitation) is reduced. The energy released by cavitation is generally reduced in the presence of stable gas bubbles.

The ozone dissolution chamber useable in accordance with the present invention is configured to create a stable suspension of the gas bubbles, whereby the gas bubbles rise slowly through the downward flowing liquid. This is accomplished by controlling the downward water velocity through matching the flow cross-section to the liquid flow rate, such that the downward shear on the gas bubbles nearly equals the buoyancy force on the bubbles. A very small portion of the bubbles (the smallest bubbles) are entrained in the flowing liquid, while the majority of the bubbles have an extended residence time, of up to 2 minutes. This extended residence time maximizes the dissolution of the gas, particularly the ozone portion, into the liquid. As explained in greater detail below, a precipitating agent 4 may also be added in liquid form before sonication. The presence of this agent will increase the extraction of dissolved compounds, particularly under the high-energy conditions produced in the sonication chamber 5.

Wastewater streams treatable in accordance with the present invention as shown in FIG. 1 is preferably exposed to sonic energy in the sonication chamber 5. The specific conditions of exposure may vary in intensity, duration, sonic frequency, and sonic wave form. A reaction chemical 6 may be injected into the sonication chamber at points where the sonic energy density is maximal to enhance reaction rates and kinetics; such reaction chemical will incorporate at least one of the following: acid, caustic, flocculating agent, precipitating agent, nucleating agent, or sequestering agent.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that certain physical and chemical reactions are enhanced by exposure to very intense sonic energy (i.e., above at least 20,000 Hz) and the accompanying cavitation energy. These reactions include: mechanical cleaving of solid particles, abrasion of solid surfaces which exposes newly activated reaction sites, intense mixing, enabling of high temperature reactions, creation of free radicals (e.g.: HO□, O2□), and promoting of reduction and oxidation chemical reactions. Direct injection of reaction chemicals maximizes the chemical concentration in the high-sonication energy portion of the chamber, which maximizes the reactions that are promoted by the reaction chemicals.

As depicted in FIG. 1, immediately after sonication in the disclosed embodiment, a flocculating agent 7 is preferably added to the liquid stream. The flocculating agent preferably incorporates at least one of the following: aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride, chitosan, or a natural or synthetic polymer. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other flocculating agents not specifically listed herein may be used as well. The wastewater stream may then be held in a tank 8 where it is preferably mixed using a mechanical stirrer. The intensity and duration of mixing depends upon the action of the flocculating agent. Intense and prolonged mixing generally prevents the formation of the floc, but an absence of mixing prevents proper dispersion of the agent and may inhibit the flocculation process. In the preferred embodiment the liquid is not held in a tank; mixing is accomplished via an in-line static mixer which briefly shears the liquid as it moves through the mixer. Residence time in the static mixer is brief, typically between 1 and 5 seconds.

The wastewater treated by the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 is preferably further processed through a settling and clarification tank 9 where suspended solids are separated from the liquid stream. The solids form a slurry that is then preferably de-watered 10 via a cyclone or filter press and then sent to disposal 11, which may include reprocessing and reuse. The resulting supernatant liquid may then be filtered 12 to remove remaining suspended solids. The liquid may then flow through one or more ion adsorption beds 13 filled with granular or spherical adsorption media to remove residual, generally low concentration dissolved compounds; such adsorption media will incorporate at least one of the following: zeolites, activated carbons, aluminas, silicas, or polymers. When exhausted, the adsorbent may be regenerated 14 and reused or sent to reclaim 15. As those of skill in the art will appreciate, standard regeneration methods vary with the adsorbent type and the chemical(s) being removed. A final filtration 16 is preferably utilized to remove particles created or mobilized during liquid treatment. The treated effluent from the system 17 then exits the treatment system.

FIG. 2 presents a schematic diagram of the liquid flow through the treatment system and the equipment used to treat liquids in a preferred embodiment. Liquid to be treated is transferred into the system via transfer pump(s) 1 and enters the mixing and feed tank 3, where mixing is maintained via mechanical stirring. Preferably, a powdered nucleating agent is added via weigh plate, hopper and screw feeder 2. At this point in the preferred embodiment, additional chemicals, such as acids or bases, may be added to the feed tank as needed or required by the treatment objective. The nucleation agent is added when precipitation of a dissolved ion is desired and the agent in combination with sonication will enable or enhance the precipitation reaction. In the preferred embodiment, the nucleation agent is class C fly ash produced by lignite coal combustion. However, other classes of fly ash can also be utilized, as can other nucleating agents such as very fine inorganic crystalline particles. In the preferred embodiment the addition rate for flyash is 500 ppm, however, other addition rates may also be used, such as 50 ppm, 100 ppm and 1000 ppm. The addition of acids or bases may also be used to adjust pH and enhance specific desired reactions. For example, the addition of a caustic can change the form of ammonia ion from aqueous (hydrophilic) to non-aqueous (hydrophobic). In the preferred embodiment, no pH adjustment is included, but one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that pH adjustment is contemplated as needed. Liquid is fed into the treatment steps via the main feed pump(s) 4 and flows through the gas contactor 5. Flow rate into the system is measured and managed by the flow controller 9. Ozone is generated as a mixture of air and ozone by the air compressor 6, oxygen concentrator 7 and ozone generator 8 and is then added to the gas contactor 5 as fine bubbles. The bubbles are dispersed and the ozone dissolved in the gas contactor 5 via a downward liquid flow and upward gas bubble movement, effectively minimizing entrained gas in the liquid stream leaving the distal end of the gas contactor 5. Undissolved gas returns from the gas contactor 5 to the feed tank 3.

With continuing reference to FIG. 2, liquid flows through the flow controller 9 to the in-line mixer 11 and a precipitating agent may be added via metering pump 10 in advance of the mixer. The precipitating agent is preferably added when one or more dissolved compounds or ions can be removed through a chemical reaction that is enhanced or promoted by the presence of a nucleating agent and/or the enhancement of the precipitation reaction by sonication energy. For example, metal ions such as iron can be precipitated by adding a sulfate, hydroxide or other agents. Dosage of a precipitating agent depends on the concentration of the dissolved ion to be removed and the specific reaction that is promoted. In the preferred embodiment, dosages range from 50 to 500 ppm.

With continuing reference to FIG. 2, liquid preferably flows through the ultra-sonic processor(s) 12. Conditions within the processor(s) 12, including pressure, flow rate, sonic frequency, power, and exposure duration, are controlled to maximize treatment effectiveness for the specific liquid stream and chemical changes desired. In the preferred embodiment, pressure is controlled to 30-40 psi, flow rate for systems no larger than 2000 gallons per day capacity is set within a range of 0.5 to 2 gpm, sonic frequency is preferably set to approximately 20,000 Hz, sonic power is preferably set to approximately 900 watts, and exposure duration is preferably 0.5 to 2.5 seconds. Liquid exiting the processor(s) 12 then flows through the pressure controller 13 and static mixer 15 into the clarifier 16. A flocculating agent may preferably be added via metering pump 14 in advance of the static mixer 15. The addition rate of a flocculating agent will, in the preferred embodiment, be determined by the concentration and characteristics of fine solid particles either present in the liquid to be treated or generated by the nucleating agent and sonication. For example, removal of total dissolved solids from a wastewater stream produced by oil and gas wells preferably requires use of a flocculent at concentrations of 10-100 ppm. In the preferred embodiment, a chitosan-based flocculent (GTC Bio model CF05 or equivalent) is added. However, many other forms of chitosan and many other flocculent types have potential applicability and may be added to maximize the desired treatment.

Suspended solids in the liquid stream settle to the bottom of the clarifier 16, which may consist of a variety of slanted plate, slated tube, and other elements, and are removed by solids removal mechanism 17, which may consist of a screw conveyor or a suction system. The amount of solids present in the liquid being treated will vary with both the characteristics of the liquid and the amount of nucleating agent and flocculating agent added. For example, a liquid containing only nitrates, ammonia and other nitrogenous compounds may contain no solids and require no addition of flocculent. In contrast, a domestic sewage (black-water) liquid may contain 0-10% solids and the addition of nucleating agent and flocculating agent may therefore add less than 0.1% solids. The volume of solids will depend on the amount of water contained in the dewatered material, which in the preferred embodiment will be between 10% and 50%. Residence time in the clarifier depends on the density of the solids and the viscosity of the liquid. In the preferred embodiment, residence time in the clarifier will range from 20 minutes to 100 minutes. Solids are dewatered outside of the system and disposed as appropriate.

Liquid is pumped into the remainder of the treatment system via pressurizing pump(s) 18, with a portion of the partially treated liquid being returned to the feed tank 3 as controlled by the water recycle valve 23. The amount of liquid returned to the feed tank depends on the need for repeated exposure of the liquid to sonication, ozonation, and nucleating agents. In the preferred embodiment, the portion of liquid returned to the feed tank will be between 0% and 66%. For treatment of domestic sewage, for example, 0% may be returned. For nitrate and ammonia removal, for example, 50% may be returned.

With continuing reference to FIG. 2, the remaining liquid preferably flows through one or more multimedia filters 19. Multimedia filters 19 useable in accordance with principles of the invention include those available from Hayward, Model S244T Pro Series high rate media filter or an equivalent. As shown in FIG. 2, the remaining liquid preferably also flows through one or more cartridge filters 20. Cartridge filters useable in accordance with principles of the present invention include those available from Rosedale, i.e., the Platinum 700 Polypropylene filter housing with 5 micron cartridges, or an equivalent. Filtration by the cartridge filter(s) 10 is for removal of any residual suspended solids.

With continuing reference to FIG. 2, the liquid preferably flows through an adsorption media bed 21. The adsorption media bed 21 is preferably configured from a clear polypropylene tubular vertical column containing between 1 and 20 liters of media per liter per minute of flow rate through the column. Adsorption media bed 19 preferably removes dissolved compounds, and then, through a polishing media bed 22, additional dissolved compounds are removed. Polishing media bed 22 is preferably configured from a clear polypropylene tubular vertical column containing between 1 and 20 liters of media per liter per minute of flow rate through the column.

The adsorption media bed 21 and polishing bed 22 may contain one or more of the following media: aluminas, silicas, zeolites, carbons, polymers, or organic fibers. In the preferred embodiment, the adsorption media bed 21 contains a type 5A zeolite (ACS Materials ZSM-5 or equivalent). However, many other types of zeolite and other adsorbents may be used to accomplish the adsorption of targeted dissolved compounds. In the preferred embodiment, the polishing bed 22 contains granular activated carbon produced from coal (General Carbon GC 12×40AW or equivalent). However, many other types of activated carbon or other polishing media may be used to remove odor, color, and residual concentrations of hydrophobic compounds. The fully treated liquid stream then flows to storage 24.

FIG. 3 shows the various factors used to control the application of ultrasonic energy to a liquid stream being processed in accordance with principles of the present invention. As depicted in FIG. 3, a variety of factors may be used in accordance with principles of the present invention for sonication management. In the preferred embodiment, sonic energy dosage is set within the range of 0.1 to 10 watt-hours per liter of liquid treated. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that higher dosage may be required to treat relatively refractory dissolved compounds. Desired results may include but are not limited to: induction of precipitation of dissolved metals and other solids, destruction of bacteria and other microbes, chemical oxidation or reduction of organic molecules, chemical reduction of oxidized ions, pulverization of suspended solids, surface activation of solid adsorbent particles, and polymerization of organic molecules. As shown in FIG. 3, liquid flow rate 1 and chamber volume 6 jointly control exposure time in the sonic energy field. Also shown in FIG. 3, chamber shape 2 and sonotrode shape 4 may jointly induce flow patterns 3 within the sonication field, effecting uniformity of exposure to sonic energy to produce a specific result such as, for example, induction of precipitation of a dissolved metal or other solid.

In the preferred embodiment, as depicted in FIG. 3, at low liquid processing rates, a single sonication chamber with a defined volume 6 is used, with the volume of the chamber 6 and sonotrode shape 4 selected to transfer the required energy to the liquid. Multiple sonotrode collars may be used to increase the transfer of energy into the liquid by increasing the area of the moving sonotrode faces.

In the preferred embodiment, each small volume of liquid has nearly the same exposure to sonic energy. Maximum sonic intensities occur in close proximity to the face(s) of the sonotrode, such that residence time in these parts of the chamber is monitored. In the preferred embodiment, the overall residence time of a small parcel of liquid in the sonication chamber is preferably between 0.5 and 10 seconds. Residence time within a high intensity sonic energy field is preferably between 0.2 and 4 seconds. As depicted in FIG. 3, sonication chamber 6 can be fitted with a chemical injection system 5 which enables introduction of liquids directly into the high intensity sonic field(s). As depicted in FIG. 3, sonic power 7 may be adjusted by varying the electrical energy supplied to the sonotrode, while the amplitude of sonotrode movement 9 may also be controlled to create optimal conditions for specific chemical and/or physical reactions in the chamber. Sonic power 7 and sonotrode movement amplitude 9 are controlled by adjusting the electrical wave form generated by the sonic power supply. Lastly, the frequency of sonic energy 8 may be set to achieve specific objectives, including but not limited to maximizing: cavitation, energy transfer to suspended particles, and excitation and/or breaking of chemical bonds. In the preferred embodiment a sonic energy frequency of approximately 20,000 Hz is used. However, sonic energy frequencies between 18,000 and 40,000 Hz may be used, as needed, to maximize treatment effectiveness.

FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of the preferred embodiment of a sonication device useable in accordance with principles of the invention. The sonication device consists of an electrical control cabinet 1, electrical connection 2 to the device, the sonic horn 3, the sonotrode shaft 4, the sonotrode shaft collars 5, liquid inlet 6, liquid outlet 7, and the sonication chamber 8. The preferred sonication device is manufactured by Hielscher Ultrasonics, gmbh; however, other manufactured sonication devices will work equally well. The preferred sonication device is designed to treat liquids in a flow-through arrangement and under adjustable flow, pressure, and temperature conditions. The electrical control 1 is a high power oscillator that generates approximately sinusoidal signals with amplitude and frequency desired to obtain specific results and feeds the resultant electrical power to the device via wiring 2. The sonic horn 3 converts the electrical signal into physical motion along the axis of the sonotrode 4. This conversion of electrical energy to mechanical movement is accomplished via piezo-electric devices that change dimensions in response to electrical inputs and accelerate an attached object, such as the sonotrode. The sonotrode 4 vibrates longitudinally in response to motion imposed by the sonic horn 3 and transfers motion to the sonotrode collars 5. The sonotrode assembly has dimensions that increase or reduce the amplitude of the longitudinal motion of the sonotrode collars 5. Increases in sonotrode motion amplitude increases the transfer of energy to the liquid and thereby increases the intensity of the cavitation generated. The movement of the end face of the sonotrode 4 and the transverse faces of the collars 5 displace liquid as they move, accelerating the liquid locally and generating pressure fluctuations. The low pressure portion of the acoustic waves create, due to the inertial response of the water to movement and the incompressibility of the water, a drop in the local pressure to below the vapor pressure of water, causing the formation of gas bubbles. The high pressure portions of the acoustic waves then compress the gas bubbles, causing them to collapse suddenly. The rapid collapse of the bubbles generates pressures in excess of 1000 atmospheres and temperatures in excess of 5000 degrees Kelvin. The bubble collapses and resulting pressure fluctuations are referred to as cavitation. These conditions preferably produce physical alterations and facilitate chemical reactions in the exposed liquid wastewater. The liquid to be treated enters the chamber via port 6 and leaves the chamber via port 7. The size, shape and orientation of the ports 6 and 7 are designed to maximize mixing within the chamber and ensure nearly uniform exposure of the liquid to sonic energy and cavitation. The chamber of the preferred embodiment creates a rotating spiral flow that, from the inlet port 6, moves in close proximity to the sonotrode while flowing upward towards the outlet port 7.

FIGS. 5A and 5B show two preferred designs for utilizing multiple sonication devices in one treatment process. The configuration shown in FIG. 5A utilizes multiple devices in series within a single plenum, while the configuration shown in FIG. 5B utilizes multiple devices with individual chambers where the flow is split between the devices. Individual electrical control cabinets 1 and electrical connections 2 supply power to each sonication device 3. Liquid to be treated enters via port(s) 4 and exits the treatment via port(s) 5. The plenum in the upper drawing can be built in a variety of configurations, including but not limited to: square or round metal tubes, round tanks, and baffled round tanks Other sonication device configurations may be used in accordance with principles of the present invention, including flat plate sonic radiators, or multiple parallel and opposing flat plate radiators. Any of these configurations can be used in the current apparatus and be useful in applying the current technology.

FIG. 6 shows the preferred design of the ozone dissolution chamber, which provides for the dissolution of a gas, in this case ozone, in a flowing liquid stream. The chamber 1 in the preferred embodiment is a plastic tube, preferably clear, whose diameter varies with flow rate, such that downward liquid motion counteracts upward gas bubble migration. Liquid flows into inlet port 2, down the chamber 7, through the baffle assembly 6, and out through outlet port 3. A gas (ozone in this embodiment) flows in through sparging assembly 4, which divides the gas into micro-bubbles that then enter the liquid and rise slowly upward 8. Undissolved gas, predominantly the carrier gas (air in this embodiment), exits the chamber through port 5.

While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow. 

1. A method for treatment of liquid wastewater, the method comprising the following steps: a. exposing a wastewater stream to sonic energy by directing flow of said wastewater stream through a sonication device; b. adding a nucleating agent to the wastewater stream before the wastewater stream is exposed to sonic energy; c. adding an oxidizing agent to the wastewater stream; d. adding a precipitating agent to the wastewater stream; e. adding a flocculating agent to the wastewater stream where said flocculating agent is added to the wastewater stream after the wastewater stream has been exposed to sonic energy; f. removing solids from the wastewater stream by holding the wastewater in a tank where solids can settle or by directing the flow of the wastewater through at least one filter; and g. polishing the wastewater stream by exposing the stream to at least one adsorbent.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the oxidizing agent is ozone or hydrogen peroxide.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the nucleating agent is flyash or pozzolanic mineral particles.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the precipitating agent is aluminum sulfate.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the adsorbent used for polishing is zeolite or activated carbon.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the flocculating agent is an inorganic polymer.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the flocculating agent is chitosan.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the wastewater to be treated is industrial waste.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the wastewater to be treated is from an oil-well or gas-well.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the wastewater to be treated is from hydraulic fracturing operations used for the production of oil or gas.
 11. A method for treatment of liquid wastewater, the method comprising the following steps: a. exposing a wastewater stream to sonic energy by directing flow of said wastewater stream through a sonication device; b. polishing the wastewater stream by exposing the stream to at least one adsorbent.
 12. The method of claim 11, where the liquid wastewater stream is industrial waste containing at least one nitrate.
 13. The method of claim of claim 11, where the liquid wastewater stream is industrial waste containing ammonia.
 14. A method for treatment of liquid wastewater, the method comprising the following steps: a. exposing a wastewater stream to sonic energy by directing flow of said wastewater stream through a sonication device; b. adding a nucleating agent to the wastewater stream before the wastewater stream is exposed to sonic energy; c. adding an oxidizing agent to the wastewater stream; d. adding a flocculating agent to the wastewater stream where said flocculating agent is added to the wastewater stream after the wastewater stream has been exposed to sonic energy; and e. removing solids from the wastewater stream by holding the wastewater in a tank where solids can settle or by directing the flow of the wastewater through at least one filter.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the liquid wastewater stream is brackish water.
 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the liquid wastewater is seawater.
 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the nucleating agent is flyash or pozzolanic mineral particles.
 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the oxidizing agent is ozone or hydrogen peroxide.
 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the flocculating agent is an inorganic polymer.
 20. The method of claim 14, wherein the flocculating agent is chitosan. 